usps eeoc settlements 2020 usps eeoc settlements 2020

According to the nonprofit organization ProPublica the EEOC ruled that the NRP illegally discriminated against injured workers by creating a hostile work environment, taking away disability accommodations and revealing workers confidential medical information in 2015 and 2017. Buck S. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. Agency failed to take prompt and effective action to address Complainant's claim of sexual harassment; a supervisor's fear of retaliation by his or her superior is an insufficient argument for failing to take action as a supervisor. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) discrimination allegations. Calvin D. v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Petition No. 0120151790 (Jan. 11, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120151790.pdf. In January 2016, the Postal Service paid $40.2 million to employees; however, it subsequently notified the APWU of errors in these initial payments. After an appeal, complainant later requested the EEOC reopen her case. The participation rate for FY 2008 was 0.77% and for FY 2005 was 0.88%. 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180736.pdf. The majority of cases, about 67 percent, are ruled in the plaintiff's favor when taken to litigation. 1-800-669-6820 (TTY) 2, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120172604.pdf. Colby S. v. Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. Ross R. v. Dept of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. 0120172604 (Apr. Lacy R. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. 511 0 obj <> endobj You benefit from having control of the process, since you authorize access to your information. Plains and Copperhead Pipeline Companies Reach Settlement with EEOC for $1.75 Million U.S. I know a Thomas Purviance had been employed by the U.S. in St. Louis for over three decades at the time that he was called names and mistreated by one of his USPS managers. 2020001922 (May 24, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2020001922.pdf. 0120171750 (Feb. 28, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171750.pdf. Moreover, some EEO complaints dated back as far as 2001. 536 0 obj <>stream Postal Service who was subjected to a hostile work environment for over three years and then removed. Padilla v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. hb```,,K@( Moreover, some EEO complaints dated back as far as 2001. The plight of USPS workers bears striking similarities to the experience of workers at tech and logistics giant Amazon, owned by ultra-billionaire Jeff Bezos, who are routinely victimized, harassed, spied upon, fired and denied workers compensation for injuries suffered on the job. This represents a decrease of 482 employees from FY 2008 and a decrease of 794 employees since FY 2005. Many noteworthy federal appellate decisions are frequently used as a part of the Commission's outreach and training efforts. The government-wide average was 344 days. Stanton S. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. Of the agencies completing 25 or more investigations, the Tennessee Valley Authority had the lowest average of 100 days. Velva B. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal Nos. Republican President Donald Trump has unleashed new threats to privatize the USPS in recent years, against which thousands of postal workers in cities across the US protested in 2018. Just 47% of initial appeals before the Merit Systems Protection Boardthe quasi-judicial agency tasked with ensuring agencies follow civil service laws in their disciplinary actions and other . 2021001103 (Feb. 24, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_06_08/2021001103.pdf. 0720160006 and 0720160007 (Sept. 25, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720160006.0720160007.txt. Workers in the class action suit claim that this is false and that other workers had to speed up to cover their heavy workloads after they were fired. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 26, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/2019002318.pdf. The program sought to significantly cut labor costs for USPS, which faced increasing operating costs from fuel price increases, decreasing revenue from reductions in the use of priority services like first-class mail, as well as increasing competition for the delivery of packages and urgent mail from giant logistics corporations like UPS and FedEx. First, please know that we will continue fighting to get you the best possible award. Mindy O. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. Lauralee C. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. USPS Settlement An EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v. USPS Class Complaint in which the complaint alleged discrimination based on disability against a class of employees in permanent rehabilitation positions, on a nation-wide basis. Agency's liability for compensatory damages extended back to the beginning of the sexual harassment, not the date that management became aware of it and failed to take prompt remedial action. For questions or concerns please contact our offices: Thomas & Solomon LLP - [About the Firm] 693 East Avenue Rochester, NY 14607 (877) 272-4066 (telephone M-F 8:30AM-5:30PM EST) (585) 272-0574 (facsimile) Can I be reinstated to my USPS job now while this relief process is ongoing? Barbara S. v. U.S. The ADUS award was the last in a series of four RI-399 craft jurisdiction awards that (This article first appeared in the November/December issue of the American Postal Worker magazine) 0120160846 (Apr. by Kirk Angel | Mar 16, 2021 | EEOC, Employment Law, General | 0 comments. Foster B. v. Dep't of Health and Human Services, EEOC Appeal No. Substantial evidence supported the Administrative Judge's finding that the Agency subjected Complainant to a hostile work environment based on age and in reprisal for protected EEO activity when she was issued a lowered performance evaluation, subjected to false allegations, and subjected to unfair terms and conditions of employment. However, the judge may still award as much or less as the end result. The Postal Service has a comprehensive workplace violence program to identify, review, report, and address employee assaults nationwide. Particularly useful are their publications "Questions and Answers About . 30, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120160846.txt. Complainant did nothing more than raise broad, across-the-board allegations of discriminatory policies and practices covering a variety of personnel processes, she was unable to establish that each allegation happened to every class member, and counsels actions raised concerns that the classs interests would not be protected. Ramon L. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. The U.S. For our 2021 report, we analyzed USPS data from fiscal years 2016 through 2020 to determine turnover and injury rates. Update: McConnell vs USPS NRP EEOC Class Action Lawsuit, nrpclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com, Syracuse NY Postal Carrier Charged with Discarding Mail, Kubayanda Resumes Role as Postal Regulatory Commission Chairman, Florida Postal Clerk Sentenced To Prison For Stealing Mail, Passport Applications To Commit Bank Fraud, Nebraska man gets prison for impersonating USPS Postal Inspector, U.S. Official websites use .gov A lock ( 2019002523 (July 7, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_08_11/2019002523.pdf. Claimants and their attorneys/representatives may use this site to update contact info, submit correspondence and/or supporting documentation, and view orders entered in the case. However, the EEO refused to award more than $1,000 in attorney fees as the record didnt include an affidavit submitted by Padillas attorney, only his account indicating monthly payments to his attorney for services rendered. 2019005682 (Apr. 0120132186 (Sept. 17, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120132186.pdf. Employers paid more than $439 million to resolve U.S. 20, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171870.pdf. Share sensitive First time EEO efile user? Mail sorters must routinely squat and lift heavy bins of mail over 70 pounds, which can cause knee, back and rotator cuff injuries. For Deaf/Hard of Hearing callers: 2021001514 (June 28, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2021001514.pdf. Norbert K. v. Dep't of State, EEOC Appeal No. 4B-140-0062-06). 0120162314 (June 5, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162314.txt. 2020001035 (May 20, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2020001035.pdf. Postal Service who have been subjected to the National Reassessment Process (NRP) from May 5, 2006 to present, allegedly in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. In either event, the complaint process will be suspended for 90 pending the outcome of the settlement discussions. While the parties may voluntarily settle a claim early in the process or wait until the EEOC completes . The EEOC concluded that the employee demonstrated that the Postal Service reasons for its actions were more than likely a pretext for reprisal discrimination and that the award of $40,000 was consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases. Frances A. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently unveiled regulations to modify the presuit conciliation process in hopes of finally settling some employment disputes. o o o o O o o O o tri 6 > CD o O o e o o o o o o o Q o o o O o o o o O o The NRP was utilized by the USPS from 20062011. We are looking for people who may have been affected by the unlawful discrimination alleged in these suits. The lawsuit also alleges that workers were fired after being moved to less physically demanding jobs, even if they provided written instructions to human resources from medical professionals restricting the type of work they were able to safely perform with their conditions. The EEOC reopened and found that the Postal Service had not fully complied with its previous orders.. Cristen T. v. U.S. May 4, 2020 An EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v. USPS Class Complaint in which the complaint alleged discrimination based on disability against a class of employees in permanent rehabilitation positions, on a nation-wide basis. The claims, evidence, and legal briefs for all of our clients' relief claims have been submitted to the EEOC Administrative Judge. No violation of Equal Pay Act where Agency established that the Agency-wide salary increases and the performance-based salary increase system were gender-neutral factors, were applied consistently, and explain any compensation disparity between Complainant and her male coworkers. https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0520130618.txt. Postal workers in the US and worldwide cannot allow their struggles to be trapped within the realm of the labor unions and capitalist parties any longer. Agency discriminatorily denied Complainant's religious-accommodation request for an exemption from the requirement that employees carry a cannister of pepper spray where it was undisputed that Complainant, a chaplain, had a bona fide religious belief that prevented him from carrying the spray; Agency did not show that exempting one employee, out of approximately 300 employees, from the requirement would have been an undue hardship; and there was no evidence that Agency explored a lateral transfer to a different facility or any other alternative accommodation. For complaint closures with monetary benefits, the averageawardwas$9,418. Terisa B. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal Nos. The Judge has not yet made clear exactly how she plans to move forward with reviewing the information or issuing relief decisions. Genny L. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. Agency, which conceded that it jointly employed Complainant with his staffing firm, should not have dismissed complaint for failure to state a claim; Agency's contention that it did not know of the alleged harassing behavior of staffing firm employees went to the merits of the complaint, which must be investigated. Here their was no support from the union. Administrative Judge properly ordered Agency to stop issuing cease-and-desist letters to employees who have reported discrimination, absent clear, documented evidence of some conduct (other than reporting discrimination) that the Agency reasonably concludes would warrant discipline in the absence of the employee's protected activity; issuing Complainant a cease-and-desist letter gave the appearance that Complainant, who complained of ongoing racial and sexual harassment, was just as culpable as her harasser. Ruben T. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. USPS' average time for completing an investigation was 113 days. 2020002203, 2020002190, 2020002216, 2020002197 (Jan. 28, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_16/2020002203.pdf. Class members include individuals with disabilities in permanent rehabilitation positions who allegedly had their duty hours restricted between March 24, 2000 and December 31, 2012. Pamela W. v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency, EEOC Appeal No. 0120170676 (Oct. 31, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170676.pdf. The complainant worked at the United States Postal Service (USPS). Postal Service warns vaccine rules could affect deliveries, OSHA Vaccine Rule Applies to USPS Employees. 26, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720180009.pdf. Washington, DC 20507 14, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2020005108.pdf. michael sandel justice course syllabus. Sang G. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. Kristofer D. v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0120180917 (Oct. 17, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180917.pdf. 0120063761 (4/8/08) and ordered the agency to conduct a supplemental investigation on the issue of the complainants entitlement to compensatory damages. All Rights Reserved, Disclaimer| Site Map| Privacy Policy |Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters, EEOC Awards $165,000 in Compensatory Damages, Adverse Action Not Permitted for Use of Approved Leave, Adverse Inference for Failure to Produce Documents, Agency Liable for Actions of Subordinate Employee, Agency Rationale Found to Be Pretext for Bias, Arbitral Review of Adverse Actions, Part 1, Attorney Fees Awarded Where Penalty Mitigated, Award Increased in Discrimination Finding, Benefit of Doubt when Representing Oneself, Board Clarifies Jurisdiction for Disabled Veterans, Career Intern Program Violates Veterans Preference, Claim against Agency by IPA Employee Allowed, Claim for Damages and Fees Gets Second Look, Complainants Role in EEO Investigation Part 2, Constructive Notice Bars Summary Judgment, Court Finds No Adverse Employment Action or Reprisal, Court Remands Case for Review of Suggestion Award, Court Rules Against Former Spouse Survivor Annuity, Definition of Disability under the Rehabilitation Act, Disability Discrimination by State Department, Disability Retirement and Discrimination Claims, Discrimination Due to Age, Union Activities, EEO Representative Has Viable Claim of Retaliation, EEOC Awards Substantial Compensatory Damages, EEOC Denies Agencys Request for Reconsideration, EEOC Sustains Discrimination Claim of FAA Employee, Employee Not Entitled to Accommodation for Spouse, Employee Wins at EEOC after Decade-Long Fight, Equal Pay Act Plaintiffs Must Prove Sex Discrimination, Failure to Comply with Law Judges Orders, Failure to Reassign Violates Rehabilitation Act, FEGLI Beneficiary Designation Trumps State Law, Genetic Information Nondiscrimination, Part 1, Genetic Information Nondiscrimination, Part 2, Going Straight to Court with EEO Complaint, Harassment Based on Perceived Sexual Orientation, Hearing Ordered in Involuntary Resignation Case, Hostile Work Environment and Compensation Claims, Hostile Work Environment Harassment Based on Gender, Importance of Impartial Investigations Stressed, Jurisdiction Argument after Delay in Appeal, Lateral Transfer Can be Adverse Job Action, Mixed Motives in Age Discrimination Cases, Modification of Work Schedule as Reasonable Accommodation, MSPB Applies Ruling Limiting Appeal Rights, MSPB Jurisdiction Over Newer FAA Employees, MSPB May Review OPM Suitability Determinations, MSPB Mitigates Penalty for Hatch Act Violation, MSPB Upholds Former Park Police Chiefs Removal, MSPB Upholds Removal for False Medal Claim, New Decision on Management-Directed Reassignment, NSPS Cant Impose New Probationary Period, Performance Improvement Plan Not an Adverse Action, Physician Protected Under Whistleblower Law, Pre-Enactment USERRA Jurisdiction Affirmed By Federal Circuit, Protections for Legislative Branch Employees, Reassignment of Harassment Victim Reversed, Recommended Changes to EEOC Regulations and Procedures, Resignation Reversed Due to Misinformation, Retaliation Not Covered in Age Discrimination Case, Revocation of Accommodation may be Discriminatory, Sleep Impairment a Disability Under Rehabilitation Act, Suit against Manager in Personal Capacity, Supervisors Comments Could Have Chilling Effect, Supporting a Hostile Work Environment Claim, Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Cats Paw Theory, Supreme Court Simplifies Mixed Case Appeals, Survivor Lacks Standing to Bring EEO Claim, Telecommuting as Reasonable Accommodation, Temporary Demotion States Cause of Action, Threat of Discipline Found to be Reprisal, Tolling of Deadlines for Filing Veterans Preference Complaints, TSA Not Immune To Rehabilitation Act Claims, TSA Screener Applicants Exempt from Rehabilitation Act, U.S. District Court Denies Summary Judgment, Unionists Access to Agency System Upheld, Untimely Disability Retirement Application, Whistleblower Compensation Provision Not Retroactive, Whistleblower Legislation Advances in Congress, Whistleblower Reprisal Found, Relief Ordered. Speaking of Special Interest Groups it is pathetic. 0120182156 (Sept. 12, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120182156.txt. Colby S. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 5, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171406.pdf. The Postal Service and Postal Inspection Service appropriately addressed all workplace violence cases in the six selected districts reviewed. 2019003996 (May 24, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_06_08/2019003996.pdf. An EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v. USPS Class Complaint in which the complaint alleged discrimination based on disability against a class of employees in permanent rehabilitation positions, on a nation-wide basis. She alleged discrimination based on race, national origin, and sex. When the Merit Systems Protection Board dismisses a case for lack of jurisdiction, the matter is no longer a mixed case and should be remanded to the agency for further processing as a non-mixed complaint. 3, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180137.pdf. The same year, several media outlets began to speculate that the USPS was going out of business. Although the Agency argued that there were "security reasons" for delaying the accommodation, it did not provide any details describing the concerns, it "lost track" of his request for approximately five months, and it failed to respond adequately to his request for a list of Agency-approved software.